The interesting thing to me is how much egocentrism existed in each of these articles. Each woman felt they were alone in their marriage, and the decision was up to them. Each flailed about on their own with the decision instead of recognizing the issue as being about a lack of intimacy that was present in the marriage, not just the man.
When we can communicate with our mate what it is that turns us on, it excites them. When we show our pleasure to our partner, they get excited, which then turns us on.
Yet of course, the Smart Marriages coalition and the anti gay marriage activists all claim marriage as their highest value. So why is it if this is the highest value for this group, that their marriages fail?
I posted on my Facebook page about how little compassion we, as a culture, have for people who act badly. Okay, yes, we are upset that Tiger, who many of us had on a pedestal has fallen so far down. But it happens to the greatest of men in the greatest of roles. Why should [...]
The words carry a lot of connotation. Google says it’s meaning is: “beloved: a beloved person; used as terms of endearment”, but then it says, “Beloved” means “someone who is loved; something that is loved”. I think they call that circular logic.
But now, according other “experts”, the G-Spot doesn’t exist at all and was merely a fantasy? Here is my take: We all have different levels of sensitivity and experience orgasm differently.
